KwaZulu-Natal – dryland
KwaZulu-Natal: Bloedrivier | |||
---|---|---|---|
Crop | Maize | Soybeans | |
Production system | Dryland | ||
1. Income |
|||
Yield: deterministic | Ton/ha | 7.00 | 2.65 |
SAFEX simulated price / producer price: 2020 | R/ton | 2 610 | 5 235 |
Total deductions | R/ton | 407 | 141 |
– Transport differential | R/ton | 338 | – |
– Grade differential | R/ton | – | – |
– Marketing and handling | R/ton | 69 | 141 |
Price premiums | R/ton | – | – |
Net farm gate price | R/ton | 2 203 | 5 094 |
Gross income | R/ha | R15 419 | R13 498 |
2. Variable expenditures |
|||
Contracting | R/ha | – | – |
Crop insurance | R/ha | 586 | 1 647 |
Fertilizer | R/ha | 3 585 | 1 557 |
Lime | R/ha | 613 | – |
Seed | R/ha | 2 561 | 1 159 |
Fuel | R/ha | 1 102 | 654 |
Herbicide | R/ha | 1 109 | 900 |
Insecticide / Fungicides | R/ha | 679 | 715 |
Marketing costs | R/ha | – | – |
Repairs and maintenance | R/ha | 714 | 447 |
Casual labour | R/ha | 171 | – |
Aerial spray | R/ha | – | – |
Other expenditure | R/ha | – | – |
Total variable expenditure | R/ha | R11 120 | R7 079 |
Total variable expenditure | R/ton | R1 589 | R2 671 |
3.1 Gross margin | R/ha | R4 300 | R6 419 |
3.2 Gross margin | R/ton | R614 | R2 422 |
Break-even yield | T/ha | 5.05 | 1.39 |
Break-even price | R/ton | R1 589 | R2 671 |
Gross margin per hectare: KwaZulu-Natal (Bloedrivier)
Yield (t/ha) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Producers price | 5.50 | 6.00 | 6.50 | 7.00 | 7.50 | 8.00 | 8.50 |
R1 803 | -1 204 | -303 | 598 | 1 500 | 2 401 | 3 303 | 4 204 |
R1 903 | -654 | 297 | 1 248 | 2 200 | 3 151 | 4 103 | 5 054 |
R2 003 | -104 | 897 | 1 898 | 2 900 | 3 901 | 4 903 | 5 904 |
R2 103 | 446 | 1 497 | 2 548 | 3 600 | 4 651 | 5 703 | 6 754 |
R2 203 | 996 | 2 097 | 3 198 | 4 300 | 5 401 | 6 503 | 7 604 |
R2 303 | 1 546 | 2 697 | 3 848 | 5 000 | 6 151 | 7 303 | 8 454 |
R2 403 | 2 096 | 3 297 | 4 498 | 5 700 | 6 901 | 8 103 | 9 304 |
R2 503 | 2 646 | 3 897 | 5 148 | 6 400 | 7 651 | 8 903 | 10 154 |
R2 603 | 3 196 | 4 497 | 5 798 | 7 100 | 8 401 | 9 703 | 11 004 |
Yield (t/ha) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Producers price | 2.00 | 2.25 | 2.50 | 2.65 | 3.00 | 3.25 | 3.50 |
R4 694 | 2 308 | 3 482 | 4 655 | 5 359 | 7 002 | 8 175 | 9 349 |
R4 794 | 2 508 | 3 707 | 4 905 | 5 624 | 7 302 | 8 500 | 9 699 |
R4 894 | 2 708 | 3 932 | 5 155 | 5 889 | 7 602 | 8 825 | 10 049 |
R4 994 | 2 908 | 4 157 | 5 405 | 6 154 | 7 902 | 9 150 | 10 399 |
R5 094 | 3 108 | 4 382 | 5 655 | 6 419 | 8 202 | 9 475 | 10 749 |
R5 194 | 3 308 | 4 607 | 5 905 | 6 684 | 8 502 | 9 800 | 11 099 |
R5 294 | 3 508 | 4 832 | 6 155 | 6 949 | 8 802 | 10 125 | 11 449 |
R5 394 | 3 708 | 5 057 | 6 405 | 7 214 | 9 102 | 10 450 | 11 799 |
R5 494 | 3 908 | 5 282 | 6 655 | 7 479 | 9 402 | 10 775 | 12 149 |
Yield | Price (R/ton) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R4 794 | R4 894 | R4 994 | R5 094 | R5 194 | R5 294 | R5 394 | |
1.65 | -3 469 | -3 304 | -3 139 | -2 974 | -2 809 | -2 644 | -2 479 |
1.90 | -2 271 | -2 081 | -1 891 | -1 701 | -1 511 | -1 321 | -1 131 |
2.15 | -1 072 | -857 | -642 | -427 | -212 | 3 | 218 |
2.40 | 126 | 366 | 606 | 846 | 1 086 | 1 326 | 1 566 |
2.65 | 1 324 | 1 589 | 1 854 | 2 119 | 2 384 | 2 649 | 2 914 |
2.90 | 2 523 | 2 813 | 3 103 | 3 393 | 3 683 | 3 973 | 4 263 |
3.15 | 3 721 | 4 036 | 4 351 | 4 666 | 4 981 | 5 296 | 5 611 |
3.40 | 4 919 | 5 259 | 5 599 | 5 939 | 6 279 | 6 619 | 6 959 |
3.65 | 6 118 | 6 483 | 6 848 | 7 213 | 7 578 | 7 943 | 8 308 |
Notes
- The cost items reflect the input allocation based on the target yield for the respective crops.
- Although some expenditure items are zero, it is reflected in the budgets to allow for individual inclusion.
- Fertiliser assumptions (kg/ha): Maize N:P:K – 140:22:22. Soybeans N:P:K – 10:18:36.
- Micro-elements such as calcium, magnesium and zinc are included in the fertiliser costs.
- The cost of fuel includes pre-harvest and harvesting costs with the assumption that own machinery is used.
- The cost for soybean seed reflects a combination of own and purchased seed.
- There will be large fluctuations for insurance cost (hail) based on the associated risk in respective areas. It is advised that producers adjust this cost based on their individual premiums.
- It is important to note that overhead costs are not included and should be accounted for.